This week the Outdoor Retailer show is being held in Utah. OR is a trade shoe where companies in the outdoor sports niche show off their new products (I wish I was there!), and it’s a week when I often get a bunch of press releases announcing new shoes, gear, and gadgets. For example, on Tuesday I wrote about 5 new shoe models released by Hoka. Yesterday I received two separate emails from Timex announcing a new GPS watch, the Timex Ironman One GPS+. It looks like an interesting device, so I thought I’d share (I’m a sucker for fitness electronic devices!).

I’ve largely been a Garmin user when it comes to personal use for running (205—>610—>620 is my progression over the past 5 or so years). However, I have tried a few Timex devices, and was impressed by the Timex Run Trainer 2.0. The Ironman One GPS+ looks to be a big step beyond what the Run Trainer offered, and in some ways reminds me of the MotoActv. I have not seen the One GPS+ in person, but I’ll provide an overview of the major features and some thoughts (I’m hoping to get a loaner unit to try out when they are available).

Here is a list of what Timex describes as the “game-changing” features (their phrase) of the One GPS+:

• Stand-alone wireless connectivity without a phone via AT&T 3G
• Email-based messaging capabilities
• Tracking capabilities that communicate the user’s location to friends and family anytime, anywhere with no phone needed
• Custom-built “Find Me Mode” safety solution, which allows users to send an alert with exact location in case of an emergency
• Ability to track speed, distance and pace in real-time and instantaneously share performance metrics through your favorite social media and online fitness platforms
• Water resistance up to 50 meters, an essential feature for water exposure, training in the rain or swimming
• Built-in MP3 component  with 4 GB of memory to play music via a Bluetooth headset
• Always-on, sunlight-readable, high-resolution touch display
• One year of data connectivity by AT&T included for U.S. and Canadian subscribersAnd here is a video overview of the device:

  Some Thoughts

1. Touch Screen – I’ve used several touch-screen GPS watches. Some have been really well done (Motorola MotoActv), some less so (Garmin 610). I currently use a Garmin 620 for most of my training (still need to review it), and though the touch screen is more user-friendly than that on the 610, it’s nothing like the screen of a smart phone or even the MotoActv. It’ll be interesting to see how the interface works on the Timex One – the screen looks nice in the images, and they even go so far as to say the images are not doctored (see screen-capture below, though it looks a bit less vivid than the screen in the image at the top of the page) to make them look better than in reality (like Garmin did for the 620 – the crisp, vivid colors on the product pages for that watch are a far cry from reality). If the interface is anything like the MotoActv it’ll be a big plus.

2. 3G Connectivity – Perhaps the biggest selling point for the Timex One is the ability to access AT&T’s 3G network directly, no paired phone required. This allows for features like messaging (via email) on the run (not that I necessarily want to get messages while I run…), real time tracking (if my wife wants to know where I am, a solid safety feature and great way to view progress in long races), “Find Me Mode” for emergency messaging (could have used this yesterday after my 15 mile run in the heat!), auto-upload to 3rd party sites, etc.

Timex says that a purchase of the watch will come with a year of AT&T data service, but there is no hard number yet as far as I can tell regarding what pricing will be for subsequent years. This to me will be the big hurdle for this watch – if the data plan for subsequent years is priced too high, I imagine it will prevent a lot of people from going with the Timex One. I’m not sure what I’d be willing to pay, but it would not be a big number since carrying my phone paired to my Garmin 620 on a long run is less of a hassle than a big, recurring hit to my wallet.

3. Music – This is actually the feature that most appeals to me. I loved being able to stream music via Bluetooth on the MotoActv – it allowed me to ditch my phone/iPod on the short runs when I wanted music but wasn’t concerned about safety (I almost always take my phone on long runs for safety reasons). The Timex One has 4gb of music storage, and it streams to synced Bluetooth headphones (I use a pair of Jaybird Freedom Bluetooth headphones paired with my phone when I need music on a run – they have been rock-solid in terms of performance). Questions here will be Bluetooth signal strength (I sometimes get signal dropouts when hand-carrying my iPhone on a run, same happened from time to time with the MotoActv on my wrist).

4. Workout Tracking – There’s not a lot of detail on the product preview page regarding workout tracking options, and accuracy is always something that needs to be assessed hands-on with a unit for a few weeks. DC Rainmaker posted yesterday on this device and provides some hands-on detail about the workout features, and looks like the watch will allow construction of custom workouts (e.g., intervals), pace/heart rate alerts, etc. Bascially everything a high-end GPS watch should do.

5. Size – it’s hard to tell without comparative photos, but this looks like a big watch. Might not be the best choice for wear with a suit (like the guy in the photo to the left!).

6. Battery Life – this was the biggest issue for me with the Motorola MotoActv, and will be a thing to watch for with the Timex One. Timex is estimating 8 hours in GPS + cellular mode, but only 4 when you add music in. This could be problematic if you are not a sub-4 hour marathoner and would like to use the device with music in a race. Be prepared for frequent charging if you regularly use the streaming music on your training runs.

As mentioned above, I hope to get a demo unit to play with at some point, but if you’re looking for a bit more detail you can check out the Timex webpage for the One. It’s due to be released around the beginning of November, and MSRP is $399 or $449 (with Heart Rate Monitor).

For much more detail, I’d also encourage you to check out DC Rainmaker’s hands-on preview post about the Timex One GPS+. He covers a lot more detail than I can since he’s had a chance to play with it a bit. He also covers the release of three other new Timex fitness devices, including a Garmin Vivofit-like activity tracker (Move X20), and entry-level GPS watch (Run X20), and a Magellan Echo-like watch (Run X50+) that interfaces with smart-phone apps.

A few months ago a company named Mio contacted me to ask if I’d be interested in trying one of their wrist-mounted heart rate monitors (Disclosure: the product reviewed here was a media sample provided free of charge for review purposes – you can read about my approach to writing honest blog reviews here). I really like the concept of wrist-mounted HRMs. I can wear it as I would a watch, and leave it on my wrist indefinitely if I feel like it. No more strap to worry about taking on and off, no sweaty bands to rinse out, etc. I was game to give it a try, and they offered a choice between the Mio Link and the Mio Alpha.

The main differences between the Link and Alpha are as follows:

• Mio Alpha (below right) has a screen and looks like a regular wristwatch
• Mio Link can communicate via both ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart, whereas the Alpha lacks ANT+
• Mio Link costs $99, whereas the Alpha costs $199

Since I already have a GPS watch with a screen on one wrist (Garmin 620) and a Garmin Vivofit activity monitor on the other wrist (also with a screen), the Mio Alpha seemed like overkill. I’m used to wearing lots of electronic devices, but three screens is a bit much! So I agreed to try out the Link, and I’ve now been using it regularly for a bit over a month.

How It Works

The Mio works by shining two green LEDs through the skin, and there is a sensor between the lights that can monitor pulsing blood flow below the device. Pretty cool! On their website, Mio points out that similar technology is used in hospitals with those little heart-rate sensing clips they put on your finger, but the challenge was to create a device that can measure an athlete on the move, not a patient sitting or lying down in a hospital. This is dependent on a tight light seal between the device and the skin – more on this in a bit.

You can see the Mio Link with the LEDs turned off and on in the two photos below. The sensor is located between the two lights.

The Mio Link is simple to operate – you just press the button on the top of the device and a light flashes. It can then be paired either with a watch or phone via ANT+ or Bluetooth Smart (a device compatibility list can be found here). Connectivity has been a breeze for me with my iPhone 5s, the Garmin 620, a Garmin Forerunner 15, and the Garmin Vivofit. You can see the Vivofit reading data from the Mio Link in the photo below (the first number denotes HR zone, second number is current heart rate) – they both fit comfortably on the same wrist and the proximity makes for a solid and stable connection. I have also recorded concurrently with my Vivofit and Garmin 620 (on the opposite wrist) without issue.

While running, the Mio Link has a light that flashes different colors to indicate your current heart rate zone. You can set these zones up by connecting your Mio to a phone and adjusting settings in the Mio Go app – a red flashing light indicates zone 5, purple is zone 4, yellow is zone 3, and so on… The Mio App also has basic workout features, but my guess is most people will use the device in tandem with a GPS watch or with one of the more dedicated fitness apps (e.g., Strava, Wahoo Fitness, MapMyRun, Runkeeper, etc.).

Personally, I don’t pay much attention to the Mio itself while running since I have the HR readout displayed on my synced GPS watch. This gives better real-time feedback of heart rate, and is why I’d probably opt for a Mio Alpha if I didn’t already have a watch that could sync with the Link.

The Mio is powered by a rechargeable battery, and Mio claims about 8-10 hours of recording time per charge. This is pretty consistent with my experience. To charge, I simply pop the Mio unit out of the wristband and place it on its USB charging cradle. I’ve gotten in the habit of charging the Mio anytime I charge my Garmin 620 – keeps them both fresh and ready to go. Couple of complaints about the charging cradle – I wish the cable was a bit longer, and it’s tough to get a good cradle lock unless you take the Mio hardware out of the band (the band doesn’t lay flat very well and tends to pop it off the charger).

Performance

My experience with the Mio Link so far has been very positive. I’d seen mixed reviews (e.g., check out the comments section on DC Rainmaker’s excellent review or the reviews on Amazon.com), with some people reporting that it experiences lags or drops HR signal from time to time, whereas others seemed to love it and have had no such problems. I’d put myself in the latter camp.

For the most part the recording from the Mio Link has been solid and consistent for me when paired with either my Vivofit or Garmin 620. The only time I have seen drop-outs with any regularity is during walk breaks when the signal to the 620 on my opposite hand seems to get disrupted, perhaps because my body is between the devices (apparently the ANT+ signal has trouble passing through the body). I’ve never seen a dropped signal on my Vivofit located on the same wrist as the Mio Link.

On rare occasions I have noticed the Mio Link stutter a bit, and every time this has happened I have found that simply tightening up the band a bit solves the problem. The key with devices like this is to create a tight light seal between the device and the skin – not uncomfortably tight, but you don’t want the device shifting around to much relative to the skin surface. It may also help that I wear it a bit higher up on my wrist since it is next to the Vivofit. This part of the wrist is a bit less bony, and may make a tighter light seal.

I should note that I have somewhat meaty forearms, and this may also facilitate a good seal on me. I also have a compact, high arm carry while running, and my hands tend to stay in front of my body (as opposed to walking when they swing forward and backward in front of and behind my hips). Some runners have a lower, more exaggerated arm carry where it may be more likely that the hands become blocked by the body for some portion of the stride – it may be that this type of form will create more problems with stable signal transmission.

For people with connectivity issues, Mio recommends a few things to try:

1. Wear the Link on the same wrist as your watch.

2. Wear the Link higher up on your wrist away from the bony bits (a tight light seal is critical).

3. Wear the Link with the sensor reading from the underside of your wrist rather than the top.

I’d suggest that if your body/form is not a good match for the Mio (e.g., you have connectivity/signal drop issues), contact customer support and ask for a refund.

Sample Heart Rate Tracks

My experience so far is that heart rate data recorded by the Mio is quite consistent with my perceived effort, so I’m very happy with recording accuracy. For a few examples of recorded heart rate data, below are heart rate tracks produced via the Mio Link and captured by my Garmin 620. The graphs are screen captures from Garmin Connect.

First is from a hilly 6 mile run up in Vermont last week – the downward spike just before the 25 minute mark was a water stop, and the smaller downward spike around minute 42 was due to the arrival of a thunderstorm and downpour that necessitated a stop to put my phone and camera into a ziploc bag. Pretty solid!

Second is a graph from a hilly 15 mile run I did a few weeks ago. All but the first (bathroom stop at the bottom of a hill) of the downward spikes represent walk breaks on big uphills (practicing race strategy for a hilly ultra this Fall).

Dislikes

My only real complaint about the Mio Link so far is that the band can be a bit finicky. It seems like every other buckle hole leads to the little nubs at the end of the strap misaligning with their corresponding holes. Not a big problem, but you have to fiddle with the band a bit to get everything lined up right. I’ve also noticed that the holes on the band get a bit uncomfortable against the skin when the band gets wet and the Mio is cinched tight. Loosening it up when not in active use takes care of this (again, it has to be pretty tightly cinched against the skin when in use).

Conclusion

I was kind of skeptical about the accuracy of a wrist-mounted heart rate monitor like this, especially after reading some complaints about connectivity issues and signal dropouts. After using it regularly for awhile I can say that I’ve been extremely impressed by the device, with the caveat that my forearms are meaty (thus create a good light seal) and my running form may be a good match for stable signal connectivity (compact, high arm carry).

Tracking has overall been very solid, and I love the fact that the Mio allows me to ditch the chest strap. The fact that other companies are integrating Mio technology into their devices (e.g., adidas, TomTom) adds further support that it is being viewed as stable and accurate technology by 3rd parties.

If you like to monitor heart rate but hate messing with a chest strap, the Mio Link is definitely worth a look!

Update 1/8/2015: I have now reviewed the Scosche Rhythm+ and prefer it to the Mio Link. Check out the review here.

Purchasing Options (Affiliates)

The Mio Link is available for purchase at Amazon.com (it comes in two sizes depending on your wrist size – make sure you check which is right for you). Amazon also carries the Mio Alpha if you prefer having a screen.

The Mio Link is also available at Clever Training (Clever Training offers a 10% off discount to Runblogger readers on select products using code RunBlogXJT).

Outside of the US, the Mio Link is available at Amazon UK and Amazon Canada.

Purchases made from retail sites linked above provide Runblogger with a small commission and help me to produce detailed reviews like this one. Your support is very much appreciated!