Comments on: Rotating Running Shoes: Thoughts From Saucony https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html Running Shoes, Gear Reviews, and Posts on the Science of the Sport Sat, 04 Oct 2014 16:09:36 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.11 By: Anthony Yosi https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129883785 Sat, 04 Oct 2014 16:09:36 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129883785 In reply to Peter Larson.

Peter:
We are introducing a new footwear technology concerning rotating shoes. This new footwear technology was scientifically developed and it has the affidavit for the Harvard Medical School. Please visit our website: http://www.therotationshoe.com for information about this amazing technology and styles developed till now. All styles will be available in local stores soon.

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129695257 Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:03:22 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129695257 In reply to Steve.

Actually, yes, very much so. Minimal is very much a small niche, and traditional shoes still dominate sales. Born to Run kicked up a lot of interest in the minimal stuff, and lots of media coverage, etc. It was the new thing, and people were very excited. Things have settled back down now. I run mostly on the more minimal end, but will run in more traditional shoes as well for reviews. I find value in experimenting and using different things.

]]>
By: Steve https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129691675 Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:11:26 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129691675 In reply to Peter Larson.

Thanks for the reply; it is much appreciated.

But I have to say, in searching online regarding running shoes, given the volumes of articles extolling the virtues of low/zero drop shoes, one would think literally no one runs in traditional running shoes anymore– and by traditional, I mean a shoe with anywhere from 10-12 mm drops with cushioning. It just seems like article after article either dismisses them– or flat out states they are both unnatural, and hazardous to one’s foot health. It’s getting harder and harder to find people– at least via the net– that fully support and use traditional runners.

Perhaps it’s just the weight of so much information in light of Born To Run, but honestly: do people still favour– and support– traditional running shoes these days?

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129671751 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 17:13:58 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129671751 In reply to Steve.

I think the idea is that if all else is the same, having shoes that differ a bit in construction makes sense. So maybe something firmer/softer or a bit higher/lower drop.

]]>
By: Steve https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129668894 Sat, 31 May 2014 23:42:55 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129668894 Well, here’s my relatively simple question. I follow– somewhat– that rotating shoes can be beneficial, given one’s tendency to run differently at varying speeds and distances. But what if you– generally– tend to run the same distance every time? I run with with a pair Saucony Ride 6’s– neutral, with an 8 inch heel drop. Should my next shoe in a rotation be one with the same specs: neutral, with an 8 inch heel drop. Or can– and should— that vary as well? That is– if the distance– and surface– remains generally the same?

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129544143 Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:26:44 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129544143 In reply to J.

Perfectly fine to branch out, but two different pairs from the same brand could work equally as well.

]]>
By: J https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129543188 Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:21:20 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129543188 I am a Brooks Ravenna lover. Friday I bought my Ravennas and as always love them. At the store I was given Newton Energy for my shorter runs (as alternate shoes) as I wanted something different. My question is should I rotate with a different type of shoe of the same brand, (Flow, Connect, Cadence) or is it OK to branch out to other brands when like me has had great experience with Brooks. I don’t want to have two pairs of Ravenna, yet I am confused.

]]>
By: Gary https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129519178 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:49:08 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129519178 I just stumbled across this blog and thought I would add the perspective of a senior citizen. I began competitive running in 1962 in the days when we raced sockless – in shoes that would now be called bare minimalist. I still run in versions of those shoes from the late 70’s to mid 80’s. I only throw them away when they are beyond repair with a glue gun. I was fortunate enough to be a sponsored runner back then, so the vast majority of them were free. Now that I’m retired I couldn’t afford the current models even if I was interested, but my point with this response is to illustrate that it is not the shoes but the running form that allows for life-long enjoyment of the sport.

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129516628 Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:50:57 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129516628 In reply to Zed.

Good point!

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129516627 Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:50:41 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129516627 In reply to Scott.

Maybe after a lengthy period of break-in for one of the pairs, but I think a shoe of different construction will have a bigger effect.

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129516626 Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:49:39 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129516626 In reply to Tom.

Kinematics may be similar, but forces change with properties of the material underfoot. This is the entire basis for the function of orthotic devices, they change how forces are applied to tissues moreso than they actually change motion. Shoes are basically orthotics.

And yes, vary speed, hills etc. is great, and I’ve said that a bunch of times. But a lot of runners don’t vary speed, avoid hills, or don’t have access to them. Many just do the same route at the same speed every time they go out, and they might do that 4-5 times per week.

]]>
By: Peter Larson https://runblogger.com/2014/02/rotating-running-shoes-thoughts-from-saucony.html#comment-1129516624 Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:43:43 +0000 http://runblogger.com/?p=3129#comment-1129516624 In reply to Mark Rep.

They run on variable surfaces, not uniform asphalt.

]]>