Comments on: Brooks Transcend and Altra Olympus: Max Cushioning In a Lightweight Package Appears To Be The New Trend in Running Footwear https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html Running Shoes, Gear Reviews, and Posts on the Science of the Sport Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:18:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.11 By: Jeff https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-1129518985 Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:18:51 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-1129518985 I have used the Altra Instinct 1.5, the Altra One and the Altra Torin.

All 3 of these shoes are good but none of them is perfect. The Instinct 1.5 has an awesome shape and there is NO other shoe that allows my foot to relax and spread like the Instinct 1.5 does. The zero drop combined with foot shaped last makes for an awesome run. However as the miles racked up, the cushioning quickly went down. The soles are now like a solid piece of thick, flat, hard rubber.

The Ones are a great shape and zero drop but never did come with any cushioning. They are a good shoe to teach proper form and win races but they do not have cushioning and were never designed to. They are minimalist by design yet with protection.

The Torins have great cushioning and you can really put down the miles however the Torins lost that awesome toe box and foot shape of the Instinct 1.5. The Torins make the outside of my foot, near the toes hurt. There is just not the same room as the Instinct 1.5. Close but not the same.

I really hope the new Olympus or new Instinct 2.0 has the great shape and comfort of the previous Instinct 1.5 yet with all the cushioning of the Torin. This would make the perfect shoe.

Does anybody have an opinion as to which 1 of these new shoes will be better from me? The Olympus or the Instinct 2.0? They are both on backorder but I am going to place a pre order as soon as I decide which 1 to try.

Thanks,
Jeff Colorado

]]>
By: Cody R. https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-987368455 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-987368455 In reply to SuperSonicEd.

don’t mean to come off as some guy who doesn’t like change only believes in one way only but i just don’t think people really need all THAT much under their foot

what really matters to me is zero drop, and shape of foot..at least that should still be a direction as cushioning and stack heights will probably always be fluctuating like crazy

]]>
By: DWrek https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986256649 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986256649 NB “Fresh Foam” seems interesting as well…

$110, 8.8 oz (men’s size 9), 4mm heel-toe drop. A lightweight neutral trainer built on a new midsole foam called “Fresh Foam” that offers varying levels of structure and flexibility based on the concave and convex sidewall indentations and specific foot strike patterns of a runner.

]]>
By: bob baks https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986101520 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986101520 About time the minimalist trend died. I’m tired of these flat shoes making me feel so short. Those max shoes will probably give me at least 1 1/2 more inches! I think I’ll get heavily tattooed and buy a Hummer too. More, more, more!

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986570771 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986570771 In reply to alvin.

I noticed that too, I hope it’s just the photo angle that makes it look narrow.
Sent from my iPad

]]>
By: Sam Winebaum https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986377493 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986377493 I agree that the lightweight( well maybe…), lower drop, well or highly cushioned shoe is a significant trend. I have felt so for several years but like any “revolution” lots of fits and starts. The original Hokas were tough to run anything other than slow in for me. I have been at OR and have some info and pics beyond the press releases on the Hoka Conquest and NB FreshFoam on my blog. http://www.samwinebaum.blogspot.com. There seems to be some new science out via Amby Burfoot article at RW http://www.runnersworld.com/ba…. A study with a small sample, and Pete if you haven’t already welcome your comments on it, showing that the sweet spot for best metabolic efficiency varies by runner based on the amount of cushioning. For some 20mm ( i.e like many of the shoes described in the post) was most efficient, for other 10mm, and for yet others best efficiency with no cushioning. So at least some evidence, maybe taken to some extremes, that there is a need for these new offerings. I certainly appreciate my fresh Hoka or adidas Energy Boost run legs!

]]>
By: Nikki https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-990262814 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-990262814 I am a new runner (since April), and elected to go for a cushioned shoe because of some degenerative disks in my lower back – my orthopedist said I can run, but not on a hard surface because of impact. Obviously, I’m really trying to be good about a fore/mid-foot landing to minimize impact, but figured the shoe would further reduce impact. What are the thoughts of you experienced runners? Especially any of you with degenerative disks?

]]>
By: Cody R. https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986622756 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986622756 In reply to SuperSonicEd.

i knew what you meant sorry lol,

though the body does beg to differ on the whatever you want…

heck, my friend got a massive bruise on his foot for stepping on an acorn despite wearing traditional trainers, switched him to barefoot shoes, no problems,

i understand that everyone is different, but not THAT different unless a deformity or disease is present

i also understand that a lot of these new hoka-like shoes are still not as thick as some traditional trainers

but i still feel that cushioning needs to stop and something else needs to happen, since just more rubber or whatever adds plenty of weight and that’s something to avoid too

i’m just not for cushioning…i’m trying to come up with stuff, but i’m no scientist :P

]]>
By: SuperSonicEd https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986049319 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986049319 Do we really need a higher arch in minimal shoes or even the ultra cushioned shoe like the Altra Olympus. As a forefoot striker I would rather have a shoe that is even from the heel arch and toe. And since there are “NO” zero drop shoes that are zero drop throughout what am i supposed to do just run in huaraches lol Am I the only person that would prefer a “true” zero drop shoe. Mr. Larson do you think there will ever be true zero drop shoe?

]]>
By: SuperSonicEd https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986481979 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986481979 In reply to Pete Larson.

No not the insole, I’m talking about the heights of the midsole making everything level the heel, the arch, and the forefoot. The only shoes that do this are canvas shoes like vans or converse. Sure it would take getting used too but it no different from moving from traditional to today’s minimal shoes. But this would be a more natural way of making a shoe. We were born to run without shoes, so if I wanted to protect my foot all I need is a layer cushioning on top of the foot, so different heights of cushioning are not needed for a forefoot striker. So if the heel or arch is higher then the forefoot, you have to lean in more (avoid the back of the shoe) in order to land on your forefoot. If the shoe was even throughout then you don’t have to make a conscious effort to land on you forefoot, this make forefoot running easier and more natural. Everyone has different preferences, and needs for a shoe, If you need to heel strike then you buy a shoe with a well cushioned heel. But you are right, toe shoes and barefoot style like vivobarefoot tend not to have an higher arch, but they don’t offer any cushioning.

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-987331396 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-987331396 In reply to Mark Cucuzzella.

You can feel the softness just walking in it. Jeff Dengate reports here that RW shoe lab found the Energy to be exceptionally soft in the heel and also the forefoot, heel softer than the Brooks Glycerine: https://www.facebook.com/group

—-
Pete Larson’s Web Links:
-My book: Tread Lightly: http://ow.ly/bdUO0
-Blog: https://runblogger.com
-Twitter: http://twitter.com/Runblogger
-Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/Runbl
-Discussion Forum: https://runblogger.com/forum

]]>
By: Cody R. https://runblogger.com/2013/08/brooks-transcend-and-altra-olympus-max.html#comment-986189637 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=29#comment-986189637 blech

]]>