Comments on: Running Gear Review: Garmin Forerunner 205/305 GPS Wristwatch https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html Running Shoes, Gear Reviews, and Posts on the Science of the Sport Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:18:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.11 By: Garmin Forerunner 305 Gps Receiver https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-1129465410 Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:17:51 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-1129465410 […] Running Gear Review: Garmin Forerunner 205/305 GPS Wristwatch This review of the Garmin Forerunner 205/305 GPS Wristwatch follows up on my review of the Nike+ system (see here). I've used both of these systems extensively (> six months of regular use each), and my goal here is to  […]

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-126662914 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-126662914 In reply to Nick J..

I’d love to try it, but can’t justify buying since my Garmin 205 is still
working just fine.

Pete

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-137950980 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-137950980 In reply to TrackFox.

They recently upgraded the software and it is no longer free.

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-13871116 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-13871116 In reply to Sha.

My philosophy is that as long as it works, the price is right, and it does
what you want, there’s no need to upgrade or spend a ton of money. That’s
why I don’t plan on shelling out $350 for the new Forerunner 310xt. I’ve
heard a few others report good things about the Forerunner 101 as well.

Pete

]]>
By: mICHaeL Liu https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-197301518 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-197301518 i was considering about buying the waterproof 310 but since i wil only use for running purpose, i tink i wil go for 305.
but is 305 rainproof o mayb abit waterproof?

coz don1 end up in a spoilt watch jz bcoz of water sponge. =)

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-197319460 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-197319460 In reply to mICHaeL Liu.

Yes, I use mine in the rain.

]]>
By: Martin Allison https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-8061733 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-8061733 Thanks for the overview Pete. I’ve been running with a Forerunner 201 since Dec 19, 2004 and am now at 4,736.68 miles on Training Center (not including 5.61 miles this morning!). Given the 1k miles per year, I’m not as serious a runner as you (for one thing, can’t stand racing), but still love the motivating factor of mile-by-mile feedback, and the data tracking/analysis. At age 55, my goal is to keep up that 1k yearly average for another 15 years.

Most of those miles are in my home town of Colorado Springs but also includes runs all over the US plus Heidelberg, Brussels, and Okinawa (and you’re right, it’s cool to call up the satellite views of those).

The 201 does everything I need, but uses a serial port instead of USB, so data transfer is tied to my docking station (no serial port on my laptop) and it requires the brick for recharging. Have had no problems with it but looks like a couple of the gold contacts that meet with the contacts on the cradle are wearing out, so I’m planning on finally replacing it.

I’ll certainly go with the 205 or 305, and not 405 or 310XT–not just for the value, but because the wireless data transfer (which would be great otherwise) means no USB charging, and I don’t want to have to carry around that brick! (I’m going all mini-USB: phone, bluetooth headset, and car/running GPS’s–when traveling, no bricks beyond the laptop!).

Your review clinches it–everything I’m currently satisfied with, plus a little more (plus heart monitor if I want it).

Regards, Martin Allison, Colorado Springs, CO.

]]>
By: Jim Graham https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-8017708 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-8017708 Very interesting report on all things Garmin. But I hope you’ll still talk to me when I admit here, for the first time publicly, that I’ve been running with an analog watch lately!
This morning, I ran from when the long skinny hand was around the 7 until it was sort of near the 3. Probably 5 miles, or so.

]]>
By: Pete Larson https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-8080955 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-8080955 In reply to Martin Allison.

To get mile splits in Sportracks – in the Daily Activity page, click on the run for which you want to view splits. On the bottom left is a window that probably says “Summary” where it shows your basic run data. On the the far right of the blue bar at the top of the Summary window is a little pull-down arrow – click that and you will see a variety of data presentation options, one of which will show your splits.

For your stop-time issue, click on “Settings” on the lower left corner of the Sportracks screen, open the “Display” tab, then choose “Analysis.” At the top of the screen are two check boxes that control how “stop-time” is or is not included in your data readouts. You can adjust these to your liking, as well as control a lot of other data options in these “Settings” pages.

Hope this helps!

]]>
By: Nick J. https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-126365512 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-126365512 Just wondering if you have heard anything about this or know anyone who has tried it that can compare it to the 205/305. http://inside.nike.com/blogs/n
Would you be willing to give it a shot? I think it looks nice. Hopefully it preforms well.

]]>
By: Martin Allison https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-8077135 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-8077135 Pete, I downloaded Sportracks and like a lot of things about it (and it’s certainly better thought-out than Training Center, which I’d say was intentionally crippled to prevent cannibalization of Garmin’s much better ‘for-cost’ application—except they don’t have one!).

Two things though. 1), can’t find a way to display a list of mile splits for a run. 2), run results include time ‘auto-stopped’ (either waiting for traffic before crossing a road, or just pausing to admire the first sun hitting the top of Pikes Peak, reflected in a pond). Training Center does the splits automatically…default results are total-minus-stop-time, just like on the 201 itself. These are both important enough to be disqualifiers–have I just not gone through enough options yet?

Btw, 205/305 price differential on Amazon this morning is $5. I used an HRM for several months once, but didn’t bother replacing it when it broke. As a non-racer, I run by perceived effort and the HRM seemed superfluous. I know some people doing serious training swear by them (especially those of a certain age, like me)…I’ll probably pay the $5 more just to have the option, but wouldn’t pay $20 more.

Oh well, sun’s almost up…out to run! Thanks again for the info.

]]>
By: Martin Allison https://runblogger.com/2009/04/running-gear-review-garmin-forerunner.html#comment-8087639 Tue, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost/runblogger/wordpress/?p=896#comment-8087639 In reply to Pete Larson.

I’ll be in Boston next week, near Bedford, and remember a running trail there from several years ago. I should have a chance to run Tuesday morning, will see if I can find that trail, then load that run when I get home and see how it looks in satellite view.

]]>